4.7 Article

Liver stiffness measurement as an alternative to fibrotic stage in risk assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma incidence for chronic hepatitis C patients

Journal

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 756-761

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12118

Keywords

chronic hepatitis C; hepatic fibrosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver stiffness measurement; transient elastography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Hepatic fibrosis stage is useful in assessing risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence. Aim To evaluate liver stiffness measurement (LSM), in addition to fibrosis stage, in risk assessment of long-term HCC occurrence for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Patients and methods Consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C, without past history and presence of HCC, with concomitant liver biopsy and LSM were enrolled in this study. All patients attended regular surveillance for HCC development every 312months. The medical records were reviewed. Follow-up LSM was performed at least 1year later. Results One hundred and ninety-eight patients (M/F: 112/86) with reliable LSM results were enrolled. Ten patients developed HCC in a median follow-up period of 47.8months. For patients with initial LSM >24kPa, 1224kPa, and <12kPa, 5- year HCC incidence was 45.1%, 9.5% and 0.9% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed patients with LSM>24kPa and patients with LSM 1224kPa had higher risks of HCC development (HR: 24.6, CI: 2.7220.4 and HR:11.7, CI:1.3105.2). Patients without sustained virological response after treatment also had higher risk of HCC occurrence (HR: 9.7, CI: 1.182.2). Among 106 patients with follow-up LSM, there was a higher risk of HCC development for patients with LSM>12kPa in the initial and follow-up LSM. Conclusion As an alternative of fibrosis stage, initial LSM is useful as a non-invasive method in risk assessment of HCC occurrence for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Serial follow-up LSM>12kPa carries higher risk of HCC development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available