4.7 Article

Tumor stage, tumor site and HPV dependent correlation of perfusion CT parameters and [18F]-FDG uptake in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 125-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.026

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; FDG PET; CT perfusion

Funding

  1. KFSP Tumor Oxygenation of the University of Zurich
  2. Center for Clinical Research, University
  3. University Hospital Zurich
  4. Merck (Schweiz) AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: This study investigated whether tumor perfusion, FDG uptake and their correlation depend on tumor stage, site and HPV in head and neck cancer. Material and methods: 41/55 eligible patients with integrated FDG-PET/perfusion CT from 2 prospective studies were assessed. A GTV(CT) and GTV(PET) were created. Perfusion maps were calculated using singular value decomposition method. Blood volume (BV), blood flow (BF), mean transit time (MU) and standardized uptake value (SUV) in the tumor were compared to the surrounding tissue using Wilcoxon test and Spearman correlation of perfusion and SUVmean in the tumor was studied (p = 0.05). Results: Perfusion parameters were significantly increased in the GTV(CT) of advanced tumors in comparison to the surrounding soft tissue (p < 0.01). Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer showed a higher BF than laryngeal cancer (p < 0.04). No correlation between perfusion and SUVmean was found, however SUVmean correlated significantly with BF for the HPV-positive tumors (r = 0.86, p = 0.04) and with BV for the oropharyngeal cancer (r = 0.63, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Tumor stage, site and HPV are associated with different perfusion or combined perfusion/SUV signatures. Further studies are needed to investigate if these signatures co-determine clinical outcome. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available