4.6 Article

Role of crustal and slab components in the Northern Volcanic Zone of the Andes (Ecuador) constrained by Sr-Nd-O isotopes

Journal

LITHOS
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 180-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.11.019

Keywords

Ecuador; Andesite; Oxygen isotopes; Crustal assimilation; Adakite

Funding

  1. Ecuadorian Fundacion para la Ciencia y la Tecnologia (FUNDACYT)
  2. Ambassade de France in Quito, the French Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD)
  3. Institut Geofisico of the Escuela Politecnica Nacional (EPN) of Quito (Ecuador)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A combined approach based on trace elements, radiogenic (Sr-Nd) and stable (O) isotopes allows us to discuss the role of crustal assimilation and mantle metasomatism in Quaternary Ecuadorian magmatism. Magmas emplaced in the Eastern Cordillera have high Sr isotopic ratios and relatively high delta O-18 values, which reflect crustal assimilation (6-13 vol.%) of igneous and metamorphic Palaeozoic and Mesozoic rocks during ascent and storage in the continental crust. However, in the Volcanic Front, where the crust consists of accreted MORB-like basaltic lavas intruded by granodioritic bodies, the basement rocks have more or less the same radiogenic isotopic signatures as the mantle-derived magmas. This limits the visible imprint of crustal assimilation in the radiogenic isotopic ratios. Oxygen isotope ratios are more sensitive and trace better assimilation mechanisms. They record not only some influence of crustal assimilation (7-14 vol.%) in the Volcanic Front lavas, but also point out the role of mantle source metasomatism. In this paper we propose a model of mantle metasomatism below the Ecuadorian arc, in which the metasomatic agent requires the involvement of both low-degree partial melts of the altered oceanic crust and subducted sediments. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available