4.2 Article

Variability in Associations of Phosphatidylcholine Molecular Species with Metabolic Syndrome in Mexican-American Families

Journal

LIPIDS
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 497-503

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11745-013-3781-7

Keywords

High performance liquid chromatography; Mass spectroscopy; Phosphatidylcholine; Molecular biology

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DK082610, R01 DK079169, P01 HL045522, R37 MH059490]
  2. ATT Foundation
  3. National Center for Research Resources [S10 RR029392]
  4. National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health [C06 RR013556, C06 RR017515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasma lipidomic studies using high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy offer detailed insights into metabolic processes. Taking the example of the most abundant plasma lipid class (phosphatidylcholines) we used the rich phenotypic and lipidomic data from the ongoing San Antonio Family Heart Study of large extended Mexican-American families to assess the variability of association of the plasma phosphatidylcholine species with metabolic syndrome. Using robust statistical analytical methods, our study made two important observations. First, there was a wide variability in the association of phosphatidylcholine species with risk measures of metabolic syndrome. Phosphatidylcholine 40:7 was associated with a low risk while phosphatidylcholines 32:1 and 38:3 were associated with a high risk of metabolic syndrome. Second, all the odd chain phosphatidylcholines were associated with a reduced risk of metabolic syndrome implying that phosphatidylcholines derived from dairy products might be beneficial against metabolic syndrome. Our results demonstrate the value of lipid species-specific information provided by the upcoming array of lipidomic studies and open potential avenues for prevention and control of metabolic syndrome in high prevalence settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available