4.7 Article

Ebullition-enhanced solute transport in coarse-grained sediments

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 1733-1748

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2014.59.5.1733

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [4522, N00014-08-1-0360, 7686, N00014-08-1-0956]
  2. National Science Foundation [OCE-1061110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pore-water exchange caused by ebullition of small oxygen bubbles produced by microalgae in the surface layer of sand sediment at St. Joseph Bay (SJB), Gulf of Mexico, was contrasted with ebullition of larger methane bubbles generated by archaea in deeper layers of sub-littoral sands at Hel Peninsula (HEL), Baltic Sea. At SJB, ebullition of O-2-enriched bubbles in August 2011 averaged 225 +/- 132 mL m(-2) d(-1), and at a mean bubble diameter of 1.0 +/- 0.3 mm, up to 516,000 bubbles m(-2) d(-1) were released from the upper 10 mm of sediment. Ebullition of CH4-enriched bubbles at HEL reached 907 +/- 278 mL m(-2) d(-1) in August 2003, with bubbles of 10-20 mm diameter ascending from > 100 mm sediment depth at a rate of up to 210 bubbles m(-2) d(-1). In situ chamber experiments showed that ebullition of 12 mm diameter bubbles from 80 mm sediment depth at a rate of similar to 5 mL min(-1) (254 L m(-2) d(-1)) enhanced interfacial fluid flux similar to three-fold compared to chambers with no ebullition. In contrast, release of 2 mm diameter bubbles from 3 mm sediment depth at a lower rate of, 1 mL min(-1) increased interfacial flux about 21-fold in laboratory tests, revealing that frequent ebullition of small bubbles released near the sediment surface enhances sediment-water fluid flux more effectively than ebullition of larger bubbles ascending from deeper sediment depths at low frequency. Particle image velocimetry showed that bubble ebullition effectively entrained pore fluid into the turbulent boundary layer, thereby enhancing benthic pelagic coupling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available