4.1 Article

Charcotiana and Amundsenia, two new genera in Teloschistaceae (lichenized Ascomycota, subfamily Xanthorioideae) hosting two new species from continental Antarctica, and Austroplaca frigida, a new name for a continental Antarctic species

Journal

LICHENOLOGIST
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 763-782

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0024282914000395

Keywords

Amundsenia approximata; Amundsenia austrocontinentalis; bipolar distribution; Caloplaca approximata; Caloplaca frigida; Charcotiana antarctica; ITS; lichens; molecular phylogeny

Funding

  1. Carlsberg Foundation [2008_01_0645]
  2. SYNTHESYS scholarship [DK-TAF-3064]
  3. European Community Research Infrastructure Action
  4. Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry [CTM2012-38222-C02-01/02, FPU AP2012-3556]
  5. New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (FRST)
  6. University of Waikato Vice Chancellor's Fund
  7. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Waikato

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on a combined three locus analysis two new genera, Charcotiana and Amundsenia, are proposed in the lichen family Teloschistaceae, subfamily Xanthorioideae. Charcotiana includes the new species C. antarctica, which is known only from continental Antarctica. The bipolar genus Amundsenia includes the new species A. austrocontinentalis, which is also known only from continental Antarctica, and the Arctic species Caloplaca approximata which is here combined into the new genus. The two new genera are phylogenetically distinct, but poor in morphological characters; the new species consist mainly of minute apothecia in cracks of rocks located in the climatically harshest regions of the Antarctic. They are somewhat similar to another continental Antarctic species, Austroplaca frigida, which is described as a new name based on the illegitimate name Caloplaca frigida Sochting. The distribution of the four species is mapped.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available