4.3 Article

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host-disease - Systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 352-360

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.12.012

Keywords

Allogeneic transplantation; Graft-versus-host disease; Mycopheolate; Methotrexate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all trials comparing MMF and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis. Our search yielded 11 studies; 3 were randomized-control trials (RCTs). While the incidence of grades 2-4 acute GVHD was comparable, the incidence of grades 3 and 4 acute GVHD was higher in patients given MMF (RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18-2.30). Incidence of mucositis was lower (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.25-0.49) and time to engraftment was shorter (mean difference (-3.6); 95% CI -5.5 to -1.7) in patients given MMF. All other analyzed transplantation outcomes were comparable. We conclude that MMF, compared to methotrexate, is associated with increased severity of acute GVHD. Robustness of these results is hampered by the small number of RCTs. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available