4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Current understanding of the role of Epstein-Barr virus in lymphomagenesis and therapeutic approaches to EBV-associated lymphomas

Journal

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 27-34

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428190802311417

Keywords

Epstein-Barr virus; lymphomagenesis; EBV-associated lymphomas; immunodeficiency; immunocompetency; therapeutic approaches

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI000913] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA AI000913-08] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A heterogeneous group of malignancies are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. These malignancies arise in both immunosuppressed and immunocompetent individuals and can be divided into three patterns of latency depending on the viral genes that are expressed. In Type III latency malignancies, such as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), EBV has a direct role and the activated B-cell phenotype is characterised by high-level expression of all the immunodominant EBV latency proteins. Thus, EBV-infected B cells are good targets for EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). New immune-based treatments for PTLD include transfer of ex vivo generated autologous EBV-specific CTLs or, in the case of bone marrow transplant recipients, donor-derived EBV-specific T cells. This strategy could, perhaps, also work in Type II latency malignancies, where EBV acts like a cofactor rather than having a direct role. In initial studies, T cells specific for the weakly immunogenic latent membrane protein 2 have been expanded ex vivo and have promoted tumor regression in a subset of patients. Another potential therapeutic strategy could be to try to induce lytic EBV infection in the tumor cells. This could be done by targeting genes that switch the EBV-infected B cells from the latent to the lytic cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available