4.7 Article

p53 haploinsufficiency and functional abnormalities in multiple myeloma

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 2066-2074

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NMRC Clinician Scientist Investigator award
  2. Singapore Cancer Syndicate Grant
  3. National Research Foundation Singapore
  4. Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centers of Excellence initiative
  5. Predolin Foundation
  6. Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
  7. Mayo Foundation
  8. [SPORE CA90297052]
  9. [P01 CA62242]
  10. [R01 CA83724]
  11. [ECOG CA 21115 T]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hemizygous deletion of 17p13, which harbors the TP53 gene, has been identified in > 10% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ( MM) patients and is associated with poor prognosis. To date, there is no conclusive evidence that TP53 is the critical gene. Furthermore, the functional effect of TP53 haploinsufficiency is not well characterized. By utilizing human myeloma cell lines, we showed that TP53 hemizygous loss was associated with decreased basal expression level with a partially or severely inactivated p53 response upon genotoxic and non-genotoxic stress. The pathway deficiency was manifested as defective p53 transcriptional activities, together with significant resistance to apoptosis. In some cases with p53 WT/- and no p53 protein expression, the remaining allele was silenced by promoter hypermethylation. We also developed a p53 target gene signature to summarize the complexity of the p53 pathway abnormalities in MM and showed that it is strongly associated with genomic complexity and patient survival. In conclusion, this study identified TP53 as the critical gene located in 17p13, and revealed its haploinsufficiency properties in MM. Furthermore, we have elucidated that multiple mechanisms can deregulate the p53 functions and that this has important prognostic impact in MM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available