4.7 Article

Long-term outcome with lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 2062-2066

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.143

Keywords

multiple myeloma; lenalidomide; long-term outcome; secondary malignancy.

Funding

  1. Mayo Clinic Hematological Malignancies Program [CA96028]
  2. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA [CA 107476, CA 62242, CA100707, CA 83724]
  3. Jabbs Foundation, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  4. Henry J Predolin Foundation, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Len-Dex) is a commonly used initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Although the initial response rates and toxicity are well known, long-term outcome is not well described. We studied 286 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed MM initially treated with Len-Dex. The median (range) age at diagnosis was 63 (28-92) years, 166 (58%) patients <= 65 years and 175 (61%) male. The median estimated duration on Len-Dex was 5.3 months with overall response (>= partial response) of 72%, including 26% with very good partial response or better. The median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis was not reached (NR) and the estimated 5-year survival was 71%. The median time to first disease progression, irrespective of transplant status, was 30.2 months. Overall, 143 (50%) patients underwent stem cell transplant. The median OS was NR for patients <= 70 years and 5.8 years for the older patients (P = 0.01). The 5-year OS estimate for patients in International Staging System stage 1, 2 and 3 were 82, 65, and 44% respectively. There were 21 new second malignancies after MM diagnosis (6.6%). The median survival exceeding 7 years reflects the efficacy of novel agents. The risk of second malignancies doesn't appear to be excessive in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available