4.3 Article

Anti-biofilm activity of Quercus infectoria G. Olivier against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages 511-517

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03236.x

Keywords

anti-biofilm activity; biofilm; cell surface hydrophobicity; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Quercus infectoria

Funding

  1. Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization)
  2. Thailand Research Fund: Royal Golden Jubilee [PHD/0006/2549]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To establish the effect of Quercus infectoria G. Olivier extract and its main constituent, tannic acid, on staphylococcal biofilm and their anti-biofilm mechanisms. Methods and Results: Anti-biofilm activity of the plant materials on clinical isolated of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible Staph.similar to aureus was employed using a crystal violet-stained microtiter plate method. The extract at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; 0.25 mg ml-1) was significantly reduced the biofilm formation of the isolates (P < 0.05). The effect on staphylococcal cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) of the test compounds was investigated as a possible mode of action of the anti-biofilm activity. The hydrophobicity index of all the bacterial isolates increased following treatment with supra-MIC, MIC and sub-MIC of the extract and tannic acid. Observation of the treated bacterial cells by electron microscopy revealed that the test compounds caused clumps of partly divided cocci with thickened and slightly rough cell wall. Conclusions: The results indicated that Q.infectoria extract and tannic acid affected staphylococcal biofilm formation and their effect on bacterial CSH and cell wall may involve in the anti-biofilm activity. Significance and Impact of the Study: This evidence highlighted the anti-biofilm potency of the natural products and clarified their anti-biofilm mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available