4.3 Article

The role of lager beer yeast in oxidative stability of model beer

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 225-232

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03195.x

Keywords

iron; lager beer; oxidative stability; Saccharomyces pastorianus; thioredoxin; yeast

Funding

  1. Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries [3304-FVFP-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: In this study, we investigated the relationship between the ability of lager brewing yeast strains to tolerate oxidative stress and their ability to produce oxidative stable model beer. Methods and Results: Screening of 21 lager brewing yeast strains is against diamide and paraquat showed that the oxidative stress resistance was strain dependent. Fermentation of model wort in European Brewing Convention tubes using three yeast strains with varying oxidative stress resistances resulted in three model beers with different rates of radical formation as measured by electron spin resonance in forced ageing experiments. Interestingly, the strain with the lowest oxidative stress resistance and lowest secretion of thioredoxin, as measured by Western blotting, resulted in the highest uptake of iron, as measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, and the slowest formation of radicals in the model beers. Conclusions: A more oxidative stable beer is not obtained by a more-oxidative-stress-tolerant lager brewing yeast strain, exhibiting a higher secretion of thioredoxin, but rather by a less-oxidative-stress-tolerant strain, exhibiting a higher iron uptake. Significance and Impact of the Study: To obtain lager beers with enhanced oxidative stability, yeast strains should be screened for their low oxidative stress tolerance and/or high ability to take up iron rather than for their high oxidative stress tolerance and/or high ability to secrete thioredoxin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available