4.0 Article

Rapid drug extraction from human whole blood using a modified QuEChERS extraction method

Journal

LEGAL MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 286-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2012.04.008

Keywords

Extraction; QuEChERS; LC-MS/MS; Whole blood; Forensic toxicology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A modified QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) extraction method followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been developed for the simultaneous determination of forensically important drugs and poisons (more than 90 compounds) in human whole blood. Because the QuEChERS method is commonly used for the analysis of pesticide residues in foods, we customized the QuEChERS method for forensic use. This extraction method consists essentially of two steps: (1) extraction/partitioning and (2) dispersive-solid phase extraction. In step 1, three-fold diluted blood was mixed with an internal standard (D-5-diazepam for basic drugs or D-5-phenobarbital for acidic drugs) solution, a QuEChERS pre-packed extraction kit (containing magnesium sulfate and sodium acetate) and a stainless steel bead, then partitioned into three layers by centrifugation. In step 2, the top layer (acetonitrile) was transferred into a centrifuge tube containing a dispersive-solid phase sorbent (containing primary secondary amine, end-capped octadecylsilane, and magnesium sulfate) and mixed for purification. After the centrifugation, supernatant was injected into LC-MS/MS. The QuEChERS method was applied in an autopsy case and we confirmed that this method can easily extract various types of drugs and metabolites from human whole blood. The combination of the modified QuEChERS method and LC-MS/MS could enable technicians inexperienced in forensic toxicological analysis to acquire reliable data quickly and easily. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available