3.9 Article

Effect of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) on the growth performance of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in a sequential polyculture system

Journal

LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AQUATIC RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 936-942

Publisher

UNIV CATOLICA DE VALPARAISO
DOI: 10.3856/vol40-issue4-fulltext-10

Keywords

aquaculture; polyculture; sequential system; shrimp; tilapia

Funding

  1. PROMEP (the Faculty Improvement Program)
  2. Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was carried out at the Environmental Research Laboratory (ERL), University of Arizona, to assess the effect of the addition of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), at different densities, on the growth performance of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). The growth rate and feed conversion of shrimp, both in polyculture and monoculture, were evaluated. Shrimp-tilapia proportions were 20:8 individuals in Treatment One (T1), 20:4 individuals in Treatment Two (T2) and 20:2 individuals in Treatment Three (T3), while in Treatment Four (T4) shrimp were stocked as a control group with a ratio of 20:0. The experiment lasted for four weeks at 10 ppt water salinity. The shrimp and fish were fed once a day with 8% and 3% of their body weight, respectively, using a 35% protein feed. At the end of the experiment, the average individual weight and best feed conversion ratio were obtained in shrimp polyculture treatment with highest tilapia density 6.08 +/- 0.18 g and 1.26 +/- 0.01 respectively, while the lowest scores were found in the monoculture treatment with 5.14 +/- 0.59 g and 1.35 +/- 0.01, respectively (P < 0.05). The present study demonstrate that integrated farming of shrimp and tilapia, with a polyculture sequential tanks system is technically feasible and increases the production of shrimp, which is higher than in monoculture, without any adverse interaction between fish and shrimp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available