4.4 Article

Evaluation of Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy for Identifying Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Human Skin

Journal

LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE
Volume 45, Issue 8, Pages 496-502

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22168

Keywords

skin cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; stimulated Raman scattering; confocal reflectance microscopy; optical microscopy

Funding

  1. American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery ASLMS [S12.12]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research AFOSR [FA9550-10-1-0538]
  3. NIH (LAMMP) [P41-EB015890]
  4. Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Cancer Center Support [P30 CA62203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and SignificanceThere is a need to develop non-invasive diagnostic tools to achieve early and accurate detection of skin cancer in a non-surgical manner. In this study, we evaluate the capability of stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy, a potentially non-invasive optical imaging technique, for identifying the pathological features of s squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tissue. Study DesignWe studied ex vivo SCC and healthy skin tissues using SRS microscopy, and compared the SRS contrast with the contrast obtained in reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and standard histology. Results and ConclusionSRS images obtained at the carbon-hydrogen stretching vibration at 2945cm(-1) exhibit contrast related protein density that clearly delineates the cell nucleus from the cell cytoplasm. The morphological features of SCC tumor seen in the SRS images show excellent correlation with the diagnostic features identified by histological examination. Additionally, SRS exhibits enhanced cellular contrast in comparison to that seen in confocal microscopy. In conclusion, SRS represents an attractive approach for generating protein density maps with contrast that closely resembles histopathological contrast of SCC in human skin. Lasers Surg. Med. 45:496-502, 2013. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available