4.4 Article

Induction of different reactive oxygen species in the skin during various laser therapies and their inhibition by fullerene

Journal

LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 8, Pages 685-694

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22065

Keywords

ascorbyl radical; fullerene; hydroxyl radical; laser irradiation; superoxide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the mechanisms of laser irradiation in the skin, and there are beneficial and detrimental aspects to this reaction. Detrimental side effects after laser treatments, such as redness and pigmentation, can be reduced by using anti-oxidants. Materials and Methods Electron spin resonance (ESR) analysis using a free radical trapping agent revealed that different free radicals, including hydroxyl (center dot OH) and superoxide anion (O?2-) radicals, were generated in the skin of hairless mice by irradiation with intense pulsed light (IPL), plasma, and radio frequency lasers. Results Generation of O?2- and center dot OH radicals was significantly inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion by fullerene and fullerene did not have any pro-oxidant effects as no radical adduct signal was detected. Although ROS can increase expression of COX-2 mRNA, an inflammatory marker, laser-induced COX-2 expression was significantly suppressed by the antioxidant activity of fullerene. In addition, imaging analysis of human skin has shown that erythema-associated redness caused by laser-induced inflammation is inhibited by fullerene gel. Conclusion These data suggest that laser-induced inflammation is suppressed by the ROS-scavenging activity of fullerene and that application of fullerene is effective against oxidative skin damage caused by laser irradiation. Thus, fullerene has potential as an after-care therapy following laser irradiation of the skin. Lasers Surg. Med. 44: 685694, 2012.(c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available