4.5 Article

Regional Variations in the Presentation and Surgical Management of Pierre Robin Sequence

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 124, Issue 12, Pages 2818-2825

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24782

Keywords

Micrognathia; Pierre Robin sequence; neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis; tongue-lip adhesion; resource utilization; cleft palate; Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project

Funding

  1. Advance Medical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/HypothesisTo estimate the current birth prevalence of isolated and syndromic Pierre Robin sequence (iPRS and sPRS), including demographic variations. To assess for regional variations in surgical airway interventions for PRS, and to determine the mean length of stay (LOS), cost of admission, complication rate, and rate of associated procedures related to tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), and tracheotomy. Study DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study. MethodsThe 2006 and 2009 Kids Inpatient Databases were used to identify newborns and infants with PRS; analysis using cross tabulations and linear regression modeling was performed. ResultsIn 2006 and 2009, the estimated birth prevalence of iPRS was 1.8:10,000 live births and sPRS 1.4:10,000 live births. The highest rate was in whites and the lowest in non-Hispanic blacks. There were 145 TLAs (36%), 176 MDOs (43%), and 85 tracheotomies (21%). The Northeast favored a TLA strategy; the Midwest favored MDO. The mean LOS for TLA was 24.5 days, MDO 36.7 days, tracheotomy (iPRS) 44.9 days, and tracheotomy (sPRS) 53.0 days. ConclusionsThe birth prevalence of PRS may be higher than previously described, especially in whites. Surgical management strategies vary between regions. The overall cost of a TLA admission is lower than an MDO or tracheotomy admission, owing primarily to shorter LOS. This study was limited by not taking into account outpatient expenses (nursing care, monitoring) or need for further airway/feeding intervention over subsequent admissions. Level of Evidence2c Laryngoscope, 124:2818-2825, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available