4.5 Article

Effect of Radiation Techniques in Treatment of Oropharynx Cancer

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 635-639

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815fdf0e

Keywords

Head and neck cancer; radiation therapy; radiation techniques; combined-modality; chemotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To compare the toxicity and outcomes of three radiotherapy techniques-three-dimensional conformal (3D-RT), accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost (AFxCB), and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-in the combined modality treatment of stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: Between 1998 and 2007, a total of 87 patients were treated; 23 were treated with 3D-RT, 32 with AFxCB, and 32 with lMRT. Systemic therapy consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy in 81 and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR)-targeted therapy in 6 cases. Median radiotherapy doses were 70Gy with 3D-RT, 72Gy with AFxCB, and 69.3Gy with IMRT. Locoregional control, survival outcomes, and feeding tube (PEG) dependence were compared using log-rank method. The incidence of acute mucositis and skin reaction, and grade >= 2 xerostomia at 6, 12, and 18 months after radiotherapy was compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: Median follow-up was 24 months (range 3 to 103 months) for living patients. Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control (LRC) were 77.3%, 69.5%, and 86.4%, respectively. There was a trend toward improvement in LRC in patients treated with IMRT. Acute grade >= 3 skin and mucosal toxicity were significantly lower with IMRT compared to AFxCB (P <.001). Grade >= 2 xerostomia was significantly reduced with IMRT compared to AFxCB and 3D-RT (P <.00 1). There was no difference in the actuarial rate of PEG dependence (P = .96). Conclusions: Compared to AFxCB and 3D-RT, IMRT confers an improvement in toxicity and appears to have similar efficacy in patients with. SCC of the oropharynx.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available