Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method

Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus

(2015) Sharan K Rai et al.   ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY

Creating meaningful cut-scores for Neuro-QOL measures of fatigue, physical functioning, and sleep disturbance using standard setting with patients and providers

(2014) Karon F. Cook et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Commentary: The proliferation of minimum clinically important differences

(2013) Anne G. Copay   Spine Journal

Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: built using item response theory

(2011) Esi Morgan DeWitt et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients

(2011) Kathleen J. Yost et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Pediatric Pain Item Bank

(2010) James W. Varni et al.   JOURNAL OF PAIN

An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales

(2010) Debra E. Irwin et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales

(2008) Anne G. Copay et al.   Spine Journal

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

(2007) Dennis Revicki et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY