Do individuals with and without depression value depression differently? And if so, why?
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Do individuals with and without depression value depression differently? And if so, why?
Authors
Keywords
Depression, Discrepancies, Valuations, Health-related quality of life, Time-trade-off
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 2565-2575
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-06-03
DOI
10.1007/s11136-015-1018-3
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Valuation of depression co-occurring with a somatic condition: feasibility of the time trade-off task
- (2014) Katerina Papageorgiou et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Utility Values for Adults with Unipolar Depression
- (2014) Syed Mohiuddin et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Testing the McSad depression specific classification system in patients with somatic conditions: validity and performance
- (2013) Katerina Papageorgiou et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depressive and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons
- (2013) Pim Cuijpers et al. World Psychiatry
- Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis
- (2013) Jürgen Barth et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for detection of major depressive disorder in primary care: consequences of current thresholds in a crosssectional study
- (2011) Nicolaas PA Zuithoff et al. BMC Family Practice
- Are patients' judgments of health status really different from the general population?
- (2011) Paul FM Krabbe et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Focusing illusion, adaptation and EQ-5D health state descriptions: the difference between patients and public
- (2011) Yvette Peeters et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Effects of cognitive therapy versus interpersonal psychotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
- (2011) J. C. Jakobsen et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
- Understanding the effect of disease adaptation information on general population values for hypothetical health states
- (2011) Helen McTaggart-Cowan et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Cognitive–behavioural therapy for depression in people with a somatic disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- (2010) Matthijs W. Beltman et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline
- (2010) Valmi D. Sousa et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population
- (2010) Sylvia A. H. Gerhards et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- How Bad Is Depression? Preference Score Estimates from Depressed Patients and the General Population
- (2009) Jeffrey M. Pyne et al. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Economic evaluation of a minimal psychological intervention in chronically ill elderly patients with minor or mild to moderate depression: A randomized trial (the DELTA-study)
- (2009) Catharina C. M. Jonkers et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Utility Assessment in Patients with Mental Disorders
- (2009) Hans-Helmut König et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Health State Valuations of Patients and the General Public Analytically Compared: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Patient and Population Health State Utilities
- (2009) Yvette Peeters et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- The influence of subjective life expectancy on health state valuations using a 10 year TTO
- (2008) F. E. van Nooten et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Health State Utilities: A Framework for Studying the Gap Between the Imagined and the Real
- (2007) Anne M. Stiggelbout et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started