Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
Systematic review, Patient-reported outcome, Mode of administration, Bias
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 559-574
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-09-02
DOI
10.1007/s11136-015-1110-8
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Validation of the International Prostate Symptom Score in Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms
- (2014) Edmond PH Choi et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Mode of data elicitation, acquisition and response to surveys: a systematic review.
- (2014) K Hood et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Telephone follow-up was more expensive but more efficient than postal in a national stroke registry
- (2013) Natasha A. Lannin et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity
- (2013) Jakob B. Bjorner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Telephone Versus Internet Administration of Self-Report Measures of Social Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Insomnia: Psychometric Evaluation of a Method to Reduce the Impact of Missing Data
- (2013) Erik Hedman et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Web-based versus Paper Administration of Common Ophthalmic Questionnaires
- (2013) Janine Austin Clayton et al. OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Cancer patient-reported outcomes assessment using wireless touch screen tablet computers
- (2013) G. J. Stukenborg et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Usability of an innovative and interactive electronic system for collection of patient-reported data in axial spondyloarthritis: comparison with the traditional paper-administered format
- (2013) Fausto Salaffi et al. RHEUMATOLOGY
- Faked Depression: Comparing Malingering via the Internet, Pen-and-Paper, and Telephone Administration Modes
- (2013) Jordana Hayes et al. Telemedicine and e-Health
- Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult Oncology
- (2012) Ethan Basch et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Score equivalence of electronic and paper versions of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21): a randomised crossover trial in cancer patients
- (2012) Laura Ashley et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Does mode of administration affect health-related quality-of-life outcomes after stroke?
- (2012) Anna Caute et al. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
- Influence of administration method on oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile
- (2011) Daniel R. Reissmann et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
- Telephone interviews can be used to collect follow-up data subsequent to no response to postal questionnaires in clinical trials
- (2011) Ranjit Lall et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Web-Based Assessment of Depression in Patients Treated in Clinical Practice
- (2011) Mark Zimmerman et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
- Methodological Issues in Internet-Mediated Research: A Randomized Comparison of Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires
- (2011) Lisa Whitehead JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- A Comparison of a Postal Survey and Mixed-Mode Survey Using a Questionnaire on Patients’ Experiences With Breast Care
- (2011) Marloes Zuidgeest et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- A comparison of data quality and practicality of online versus postal questionnaires in a sample of testicular cancer survivors
- (2011) Allan ‘Ben’ Smith et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Measurement Equivalence of Interactive Voice Response and Paper Versions of the EQ-5D in a Cancer Patient Sample
- (2011) J. Jason Lundy et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Effects of mode of administration (MOA) on the measurement properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30: a randomized study
- (2010) Chad M Gundy et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- A Comparison of Psychometric Properties Between Internet and Paper Versions of Two Depression Instruments (BDI-II and MADRS-S) Administered to Clinic Patients
- (2010) Fredrik Holländare et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Does Modality of Survey Administration Impact Data Quality: Audio Computer Assisted Self Interview (ACASI) Versus Self-Administered Pen and Paper?
- (2010) William M. Reichmann et al. PLoS One
- The construct and measurement equivalence of cocaine and opioid dependences: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study
- (2009) Li-Tzy Wu et al. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
- Validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale and Falls Efficacy Scale International in Geriatric Patients with and without Cognitive Impairment: Results of Self-Report and Interview-Based Questionnaires
- (2009) K. Hauer et al. GERONTOLOGY
- Differential Symptom Reporting by Mode of Administration of the Assessment
- (2009) Alla Sikorskii et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires
- (2008) J G Richter et al. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
- Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7
- (2008) Victoria L. Handa et al. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
- Adapting a patient satisfaction instrument for low literate and Spanish-speaking populations: Comparison of three formats
- (2008) Judy A. Shea et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Testing the measurement equivalence of paper and touch-screen versions of the EQ-5D visual analog scale (EQ VAS)
- (2008) Sulabha Ramachandran et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Face-to-face versus remote administration of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale using videoconference and telephone
- (2007) Kenneth A. Kobak et al. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
- Equivalence of Electronic and Paper-and-Pencil Administration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Meta-Analytic Review
- (2007) Chad J. Gwaltney et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation