Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
Authors
Keywords
Stroke, Quality of life, Rehabilitation, Validity, MCID, EQ-5D-5L
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 1585-1596
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-11-30
DOI
10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients
- (2014) Dominik Golicki et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke
- (2014) Dominik Golicki et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain
- (2013) Marko Obradovic et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Quality of life assessed with EQ-5D in patients undergoing glioma surgery: What is the responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference?
- (2013) Lisa Millgård Sagberg et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2013 Update
- (2012) Alan S. Go et al. CIRCULATION
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study
- (2012) M. F. Janssen et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets
- (2012) Ben van Hout et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Assessing the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life for Outcome Measurement in Stroke Rehabilitation: Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference
- (2011) Keh-chung Lin et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
- (2011) M. Herdman et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in German stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
- (2011) Matthias Hunger et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Exploring the validity of estimating EQ-5D and SF-6D utility values from the health assessment questionnaire in patients with inflammatory arthritis
- (2010) Mark J Harrison et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale
- (2010) Keh-Chung Lin et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Quality of Life after Stroke: The Importance of a Good Recovery
- (2009) Francisco Javier Carod-Artal et al. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
- Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation
- (2009) Yu-wei Hsieh et al. STROKE
- Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy
- (2008) T Paternostro-Sluga et al. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
- The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0
- (2008) Francisco Javier Carod-Artal et al. STROKE
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started