4.7 Article

The formation and development of debris flows in large watersheds after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 25-37

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-014-0541-6

Keywords

Debris flows; Triggering rainfall; Formation; Large watershed; Wenchuan earthquake

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [41301008]
  2. Key Deployment Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-05-01]
  3. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2012BAK10B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Wenchuan earthquake has caused abundance of loose materials supplies for debris flows. Many debris flows have occurred in watersheds in area beyond 20 km(2), presenting characteristics differing from those in small watersheds. The debris flows yearly frequency decreases exponentially, and the average debris flow magnitude increases linearly with watershed size. The rainfall thresholds for debris flows in large watersheds were expressed as I = 14.7 D (-0.79) (2 h < D < 56 h), which is considerably higher than those in small watersheds as I = 4.4 D (-0.70) (2 h < D < 37 h). A case study is conducted in Ergou, 39.4 km(2) in area, to illustrate the formation and development processes of debris flows in large watersheds. A debris flow develops in a large watershed only when the rainfall was high enough to trigger the wide-spread failures and erosions on slope and realize the confluence in the watershed. The debris flow was supplied by the widely distributed failures dominated by rill erosions (14 in 22 sources in this case). The intermittent supplying increased the size and duration of debris flow. While the landslide dam failures provided most amounts for debris flows (57 % of the total amount), and amplified the discharge suddenly. During these processes, the debris flow velocity and density increased as well. The similar processes were observed in other large watersheds, indicating this case is representative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available