4.7 Article

Urban Neighborhood Green Index - A measure of green spaces in urban areas

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 325-335

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.003

Keywords

Urban green space; Green Index; Remote Sensing; GIS; Neighborhood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban green spaces (UGS) form an integral part of any urban area and quantity and quality of UGS is of prime concern for planners and city administrators. Objective measure of greenness using remote sensing images is percentage area of green, i.e., Green Index (GI), which is insensitive to spatial arrangement within the areal units. Measuring UGS at neighborhood level is important as neighborhood is the working level for application of greening strategies. Neighborhood (NH) is synonymous of nearness and can be defined as an area of homogeneous characteristics. The Urban Neighborhood Green Index (UNGI) aims to assess the greenness and can help in identifying the critical areas, which in turn can be used to identify action areas for improving the quality of green. For the development of UNGI, four parameters, i.e.. CI. proximity to green, built up density and height of structures were used and weighted using Saaty's pair wise comparison method. Four different types of NH were compared and it was found that mean CI (0.44) is equal for high-rise low density and low-rise low density NH, i.e., both areas have same quality of urban green based on CI. But mean UNGI is higher for low-rise low-density NH (0.62), as compared to high-rise low-density NH (0.54), hence, area of highrise NH requires more amounts of good quality properly distributed green as compared to low-rise NH. The input for UNGI is easily derivable from RS images, besides the developed method is simple, and easily comprehendible by city administrators and planners. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available