4.3 Article

Assessing the cross-sectional and inter-temporal validity of the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) in Burundi

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages 2775-2785

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015000403

Keywords

HFIAS; Food security; Inter-temporal validity; Burundi

Funding

  1. Flemish Inter-University Council-University Development Cooperation (VLIR-UOS) through the Own Initiative Project [ZEIN 2007PR 336]
  2. Ghent University (from the Special Research Fund (BOF) - UGent)
  3. VLIR-UOS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo examine the cross-sectional and inter-temporal validity of the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for rural households in Burundi.DesignLongitudinal survey about food security and agricultural production, individually administered by trained interviewers in June 2007 and 2012.SettingNgozi, north of Burundi.SubjectsThree hundred and fourteen household heads were interviewed.ResultsTobit models showed that the HFIAS was significantly correlated with objective measures of food security, in this case total annual food production (P<001), livestock keeping (P<001) and coffee production (P<001) in both 2007 and 2012. This confirms that the HFIAS is cross-sectionally valid and corroborates the findings of previous studies. However, while total food production decreased by more than 25 % in terms of energy between 2007 and 2012, households reported an improvement in their perceived food security over the same period, with the HFIAS decreasing from 139 to 108 (P<0001). This finding questions the inter-temporal validity of the HFIAS. It may be partly explained through response shifts, in which households assess their own food security status in comparison to that of their peers.ConclusionsThe evidence from our study suggests that the HFIAS is cross-sectionally valid, but may not be inter-temporally valid, and should not be used as a single indicator to study temporal trends in food security.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available