4.6 Article

Development of an in vitro model of myotube ischemia

Journal

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages 1241-1252

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2011.79

Keywords

C2C12 myotubes; critical limb ischemia; erythropoietin; peripheral arterial disease; simulated ischemia; skeletal muscle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Critical limb ischemia causes severe damage to the skeletal muscle. This study develops a reproducible model of myotube ischemia by simulating, in vitro, the critical parameters that occur in skeletal muscle ischemia. Monolayers of C2C12 myoblasts were differentiated into mature myotubes and exposed to nutrition depletion, hypoxia and hypercapnia for variable time periods. A range of culture media and gas mixture combinations were used to obtain an optimum ischemic environment. Nuclear staining, cleaved caspase-3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay were used to assess apoptosis and myotube survival. HIF-1 alpha concentration of cell lysates, pH of conditioned media as well as partial pressures of oxygen (PO2) and carbon dioxide (PCO2) in the media were used to confirm ischemic simulation. Culturing myotubes in depleted media, in a gas mixture containing 20% CO2 + 80% N-2 for 6-12 h increased the PCO2 and decreased the pH and PO2 of culture media. This attempts to mimic the in vivo ischemic state of skeletal muscle. These conditions were used to study the potential tissue-protective effects of erythropoietin (EPO) in C2C12 myotubes exposed to ischemia. EPO (60 ng/ml) suppressed LDH release, decreased cleaved caspase-3 and reduced the number of apoptotic nuclei, suggesting significantly decreased ischemia-induced apoptosis in myotubes (P<0.01) and a potential role in tissue protection. Additional therapeutic agents designed for tissue protection can also be evaluated using this model. Laboratory Investigation (2011) 91, 1241-1252; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2011.79; published online 23 May 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available