4.7 Article

Theoretical analysis of a magnetophoresis-diffusion T-sensor immunoassay

Journal

LAB ON A CHIP
Volume 13, Issue 19, Pages 3935-3944

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3lc50686j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the analytical investigation of a microfluidic homogeneous competitive immunoassay that incorporates antibody-conjugated superparamagnetic nanoparticles and magnetophoretic transport to enhance the limits of detection and dynamic range. The analytical model considers the advective, diffusive, and magnetophoretic transport of the antibody-coated nanoparticles relative to the labeled and sample antigens of interest in a T-sensor configuration. The magnetophoresis-diffusion immunoassay identified clear improvements to the assay response and reductions to the limit of detection for increased magnetophoretic velocities and larger nanoparticles. The externally applied magnetophoretic transport enriched the antibody-antigen accumulation region, while larger nanoparticles led to decreased diffusive peak broadening. The integration of nanoparticles to the diffusion immunoassay (NP-DIA) demonstrated an approximately 3-fold improvement to the limit of detection of the basic antibody/antigen system, while the integration of superparamagnetic nanoparticles and magnetophoretic transport (MIA) established an order of magnitude improvement in sensitivity as well as means to greatly reduce response time. The implementation of an external magnetic force enabled the detectable antigen size spectrum to extend from small molecules i.e., 10's Da to 100's Da, up to large proteins and macromolecules, i.e., 50 kDa to 150 kDa, for a single class of binding species, i.e., superparamagnetic nanoparticle. This investigation provides guidelines for the design and development of a magnetophoresis-diffusion T-sensor immunoassay, and clearly identifies the regimes for optimal operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available