4.2 Article

Possible Involvement of Ca2+ Activated K+ Channels, SK Channel, in the Quercetin-Induced Vasodilatation

Journal

KOREAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY & PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 361-365

Publisher

KOREAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY & PHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.4196/kjpp.2009.13.5.361

Keywords

Quercetin; Vasodilatation; K-Ca channels; PK-C; Endothelium

Funding

  1. Tokiwa Phytochemical Co

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effects of quercetin, a kind of flavonoids. on the vasodilating actions were investigated. 2 Among the mechanisms for quercetin-induced vasodilatation in rat aorta, the involvement with the Ca2+ activated K+ (K-Ca) channel was examined. Pretreatment with NE (5 mu M) or KCl (60 mM) was carried out and then, the modulation by quercetin of the constriction was examined using rat aorta ring strips (3 mm) at 36.5 degrees C. Quercetin (0.1 to 100 mu M) relaxed the NE-induced vasoconstrictions in a concentration-dependent manner. NO synthesis (NOS) inhibitor, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate (L-NMMA), at 100 uM reduced the quercetin (100 mu M)-induced vasodilatation from 97.8 +/- 3.7% (n=10) to 78.0 +/- 11.6 % (n=5, p< 0.05). Another NOS inhibitor, L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), at 100 uM also had the similar effect. In the presence of both 100 mu M L-NMMA and 10 mu M indomethacin, the quercetin-induced vasodilatation was further attenuated by 100 mu M tetraethylammonium (TEA, a K-Ca channel inhibitor). Also TEA decreased the quercetin-induced vasodilatation in endothelium-denuded rat aorta. Used other K-Ca channel inhibitors, the quercetin-induced vasodilatation was attenuated by 0.3 mu M aparnin (a SK channel inhibitor), but not by 30 nM charybdotoxin (a BK and IK channel inhibitor). Quercetin caused a concentration-dependent vasodilatation, due to the endothelium-dependent and -independent actions. Also quercetin contributes to the vasodilatation selectively with SK channel on smooth muscle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available