4.7 Article

Pathological Internet use among adolescents: Comparing garners and non-garners

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 228, Issue 1, Pages 128-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.04.029

Keywords

Internet addiction; Internet gaming disorder; Psychological impairment; Adolescents; WE-STAY

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union [HEALTH-2010-241542]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Internet gaming disorder was recently included in Section 3 of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Non-gaming Internet activities were not considered because of a lack of evidence. This study examined whether gamers differ from non-garners with respect to their psychological well-being among students who show pathological Internet use (PIU). This cross-sectional study was conducted within the project Working in Europe to Stop Truancy Among Youth (WE-STAY). A total of 8807 European representative students from randomly selected schools were included. The Young Diagnostic Questionnaire was applied to assess PIU, and students with this condition were divided into gamers (PIU-G) and non-gamers (PIU-NG). Overall, 3.62% and 3.11% of the students were classified as having PIU-G and PIU-NG, respectively. A multinomial logistic regression revealed that students with PIU-G and those with PIU-NG showed similarly increased risks for emotional symptoms, conduct disorder, hyperactivity/inattention, self-injurious behaviors, and suicidal ideation and behaviors. Students with PIU-G were more likely to be male and have a higher risk for peer problems than those with PIU-NG. Students with PIU-NG had a higher risk of depression than those with PIU-G. The significant psychological impairment of PIU-NG suggests that it should be considered in future diagnostic criteria. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available