4.0 Article

Uveal Melanoma: Current Insights into Clinical Relevance of Genetic Testing

Journal

KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE
Volume 230, Issue 7, Pages 686-691

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350628

Keywords

genetics; ocular tumours; choroid

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular tumour in Caucasians. There are approximately 500 new cases of uveal melanoma in Germany per year and the incidence rate peaks at the age of 70 years. Half of all uveal melanoma patients develop metastatic disease, which can be observed even many years after successful treatment of the primary tumour. In most cases the liver is the location of first manifestation. Based on the chromosome 3 status uveal melanomas can be divided into two major classes that differ in their metastatic potential. Tumours with a high risk to metastasise usually show monosomy 3, whereas tumours showing disomy 3 rarely metastasise. If a patient wishes to know about his individual risk, prognostic testing of the primary tumour tissue can be performed after obtaining tumour material via transscleral or transretinal biopsy, or by enucleation. To date results of prognostic testing do not influence therapeutic strategies. Recently, major key genes involved in uveal melanoma development, GNAQ, GNA11, BAP1, SF3B1 and EIF1AX, have been identified. Mutation profiling, in addition to chromosomal 3 analysis, will further refine the classification or subclassification of uveal melanomas and will hopefully influence diagnostic or therapeutic concepts. Hereditary mutations in tumour suppressor gene BAP1 are associated with an increased risk for different tumour entities. Detection of germ line mutations in this tumour suppressor gene should implicate further general screening examinations of the patient to be able to detect these tumour entities. Moreover relatives of these patients should be offered a screening for BAP1 mutation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available