4.5 Article

Sex and gender in older adults' experience of Parkinson's disease

Publisher

GERONTOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/63.1.S42

Keywords

gender; Parkinson's disease; masculinity; femininity; chronic illness; disability

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [R36 HS014157-01, R36 HS014157] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [5T32 AG00029-31] Funding Source: Medline
  3. AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY [R36HS014157] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [T32AG000029] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. This article reports on the gendered experience of Parkinson's disease (PD). Data derived from 15 months of ethnographic study among community-dwelling older adults living with PD in eastern Iowa. Methods. The study utilized several methods: participant observation at PD support group meetings, illness narrative interviews with PD sufferers, and a questionnaire. Results. A total of 171 PD sufferers (106 men, 65 women) enrolled in the study. Illness narratives revealed gender differences in the impact of specific symptoms on daily life: Women's narratives emphasized the impact of the on/off effect and thinking problems, whereas men's narratives emphasized the consequences of their physical appearance. In comparison, quantitative data found little sex difference in symptomatology. Discussion. The comparison of qualitatively and quantitatively derived data reveals the importance of attending to both sex and gender. Qualitative data demonstrate how the meaning of PD symptoms is gendered and illustrate an example of how gender and sex research differ. All narratives reflect the importance of role continuity, but men's put at the forefront appearance and social isolation whereas women's underscore their relational aspects of domestic activities. These data imply that providers must look beyond symptomatology to the gendered saliency of particular somatic phenomena.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available