4.5 Article

Subclinical Impairment of Ovarian Reserve in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with Normal Menstruation Not Using Alkylating Therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 1023-1027

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4255

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973202]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Fund of Industry, Education, and Academy [2008B090500194]
  3. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China [20090171110059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Disease activity is a major factor in menstrual disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients not receiving alkylating therapy. However, the ovarian reserve of SLE women with normal menstruation is still unclear. Methods: Twenty-three SLE patients naive to cytotoxic agents (SLE group) and nineteen SLE patients receiving current or previous cyclophosphamide (CTX) therapy (without other cytotoxic agents; SLE-CTX group) were enrolled. Twenty-one age-matched healthy women served as controls. All patients and controls had a regular menstrual cycle. Basal hormone levels, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E-2), and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), and antral follicle count (AFC) were analyzed in the two study groups and compared with the control group. Results: No significant differences were found between the SLE, SLE-CTX, and control groups in age, body mass index (BMI), and basal FSH and LH levels. The E-2 (P=0.023) levels were high and the AMH (P=0.000) values and AFC (P=0.001) were significantly lower in the SLE and SLE-CTX groups compared to control. However, these values were similar between the SLE and SLE-CTX groups. Conclusion: SLE patients not receiving alkylating therapy who had normal menstruation and short illness duration still had an impaired ovarian reserve.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available