4.5 Article

Membrane glycoproteomics of fetal lung fibroblasts using LC/MS

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 47-59

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500003

Keywords

Glycoproteomics; LC; MS; Membrane glycoproteins; Microheterogeneity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) [23110001]
  2. MEXT [26293037]
  3. Health Labour Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (MHLW)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293037] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some aberrant N-glycosylations are being used as tumor markers, and glycoproteomics is expected to provide novel diagnosis markers and targets of drug developments. However, one has trouble in mass spectrometric glycoproteomics of membrane fraction because of lower intensity of glycopeptides in the existence of surfactants. Previously, we developed a glycopeptide enrichment method by acetone precipitation, and it was successfully applied to human serum glycoproteomics. In this study, we confirmed that this method is useful to remove the surfactants and applicable to membrane glycoproteomics. The glycoproteomic approach to the human fetal lung fibroblasts membrane fraction resulted in the identification of over 272 glycoforms on 63 sites of the 44 glycoproteins. According to the existing databases, the structural features on 41 sites are previously unreported. The most frequently occurring forms at N-glycosylation site were high-mannose type containing nine mannose residues (M9) and monosialo-fucosylated biantennary oligosaccharides. Several unexpected N-glycans, such as fucosylated complex-type and fucosylated high-mannose and/or fucosylated pauci-mannose types were found in ER and lysosome proteins. Our method provides new insights into transport, biosynthesis, and degradation of glycoproteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available