4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis of secreted proteins by human bronchial epithelial cells in response to cadmium toxicity

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages 3075-3086

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400489

Keywords

BEAS-2B; Biomedicine; Cadmium; Human lung cells; Mass spectrometry; Secretomics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170785, 81101785, 30870497, 31271445]
  2. Fund for University Talents of Guangdong Province
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China [S2012030006289]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For years, many studies have been conducted to investigate the intracellular response of cells challenged with toxicmetal(s), yet, the corresponding secretome responses, especially in human lung cells, are largely unexplored. Here, we provide a secretome analysis of human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) treated with cadmium chloride (CdCl2), with the aim of identifying secreted proteins in response to Cd toxicity. Proteins from control and spent media were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis and visualized by silver staining. Differentially-secreted proteins were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS analysis and database searching. We characterized, for the first time, the extracellular proteome changes of BEAS-2B dosed with Cd. Our results unveiled that Cd treatment led to the marked upregulation of molecular chaperones, antioxidant enzymes, enzymes associated with glutathione metabolic process, proteins involved in cellular energy metabolism, as well as tumor-suppressors. Pretreatment of cells with the thiol antioxidant glutathione before Cd treatment effectively abrogated the secretion of these proteins and prevented cell death. Taken together, our results demonstrate that Cd causes oxidative stress-induced cytotoxicity; and the differentially-secreted protein signatures could be considered as targets for potential use as extracellular biomarkers upon Cd exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available