4.3 Article

Accuracy issues involved in modeling in vivo protein structures using PM7

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 83, Issue 8, Pages 1427-1435

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24826

Keywords

protein; PDB; X-ray structures; PM7; semiempirical; errors; geometry optimization

Funding

  1. University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
  2. National Institutes of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R44GM108085]
  3. Merck/AAAS Undergraduate Science Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the semiempirical method PM7, an attempt has been made to quantify the error in prediction of the in vivo structure of proteins relative to X-ray structures. Three important contributory factors are the experimental limitations of X-ray structures, the difference between the crystal and solution environments, and the errors due to PM7. The geometries of 19 proteins from the Protein Data Bank that had small R values, that is, high accuracy structures, were optimized and the resulting drop in heat of formation was calculated. Analysis of the changes showed that about 10% of this decrease in heat of formation was caused by faults in PM7, the balance being attributable to the X-ray structure and the difference between the crystal and solution environments. A previously unknown fault in PM7 was revealed during tests to validate the geometries generated using PM7. Clashscores generated by the Molprobity molecular mechanics structure validation program showed that PM7 was predicting unrealistically close contacts between nonbonding atoms in regions where the local geometry is dominated by very weak noncovalent interactions. The origin of this fault was traced to an underestimation of the core-core repulsion between atoms at distances smaller than the equilibrium distance. Proteins 2015; 83:1427-1435. (c) 2015 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available