4.2 Article

Relationships between specific ultraviolet absorbance and trihalomethane precursors of different carbon sources

Journal

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2008.064

Keywords

chlorination; differential UV absorbance; disinfection by-products; Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid and effective detection method is essential for water utilities to monitor variability of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in source waters in order to apply strategies to minimize formation of disinfection by-products in treated waters. Ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (UVA(254)) and specific UVA(254) (SUVA(254)) have been widely used as surrogates of concentration and reactivity of DOC, respectively. However, poor correlations between SUVA(254) and specific trihalomethane formation potential (STHMFP) have been occasionally reported and the reliability of using SUVA(254) to predict trihalomethane (THM) formation has been questioned. In this study, the correlations of SUVA(254) and THM reactivity of three different DOC sources commonly found in water treatment facilities (aquatic carbon, soil carbon, and fecal matter) were evaluated. A 0.22 mu m filter, instead of 0.45 mu m filter, was used for water filtration to minimize the effects of colloidal materials on UVA(254). UVA(254) and DOC after chlorination were also examined and differential UVA(254) and SUVA(254) (DSUVA(254)) were compared to THM reactivity. Results showed correlations between UVA254 and DOC were source dependent suggesting natural humification and degradation processes did not alter DOC characteristics from its original sources. The STHMFP of river and soil DOC samples were comparable, whereas their UVA(254) normalized THMFP were different (p < 0.05), suggesting that UVA(254) is a better indicator in predicting THM formation potential than DOC concentrations. DSUVA(254) showed a stronger correlation with STHMFP than the conventional surrogate-SUVA(254).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available