4.2 Article

Identification and Characterization of Two Novel Alpha-D-Galactosidases from Pedobacter heparinus

Journal

PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 1052-1059

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/0929866522666150915121858

Keywords

Galactosidase; galactoside; alpha-linked galactose; Pedobacter heparinus; bacterial glycosidase; glycoenzyme

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31471703, A0201300537]
  2. 100 Foreign Talents Plan [JSB2014012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two putative alpha-D-galactosidases (alpha-GALs) belonging to glycosyl hydrolase family 27, and originating from the rather unexplored bacterial strain Pedobacter heparinus, were cloned and biochemically characterized. The recombinant enzymes designated as PhAGal729 and PhAGal2920 showed comparable biochemical properties: the optimum pH values were determined to be pH 5.0 and 5.5, and temperature optima lay between 30 degrees C and 37 degrees C, respectively. Both alpha-GALs were not dependent on the presence of divalent metal ions, and the addition of EDTA had no influence on enzymatic activity. The activity of both enzymes substantially increased in the presence of Fe3+ ions. Both enzymes were inhibited by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and urea. alpha-GALs from P. heparinus were highly specific in hydrolyzing glycosides with alpha-1,2/3/4 or alpha-1,6-linked galactose to other sugars, whereas other glycosides such as alpha-linked N-acetylgalactosamine, N-acetylglucosamine or glucose residues were not released. Nevertheless, neither PhAGal729 nor PhAGal2920 were able to remove alpha-linked galactose epitopes from native human erythrocytes. The facile expression and purification procedures in combination with wide substrate specificities make alpha-GALs from P. heparinus potential candidates for applications in analytical research, and food-and biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available