Evaluation of models predicting insignificant prostate cancer to select men for active surveillance of prostate cancer
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evaluation of models predicting insignificant prostate cancer to select men for active surveillance of prostate cancer
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 137-143
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-02-10
DOI
10.1038/pcan.2015.1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Limited ability of existing nomograms to predict outcomes in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer
- (2013) Siao-Yi Wang et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- A Negative Confirmatory Biopsy Among Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Does Not Protect Them from Histologic Grade Progression
- (2013) Lih-Ming Wong et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Head-to-Head Comparison of Prostate Health Index and Urinary PCA3 for Predicting Cancer at Initial or Repeat Biopsy
- (2013) Vincenzo Scattoni et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- 2131 DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE BIOPSY-BASED GENOMIC PROSTATE SCORE (GPS) AS A PREDICTOR OF HIGH GRADE OR EXTRACAPSULAR PROSTATE CANCER TO IMPROVE PATIENT SELECTION FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
- (2013) Matthew Cooperberg et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Comparative Validation of Nomograms Predicting Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer
- (2013) Viacheslav Iremashvili et al. UROLOGY
- International multicentre study examining selection criteria for active surveillance in men undergoing radical prostatectomy
- (2012) L-M Wong et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up
- (2012) G. L. Andriole et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Prostate-Cancer Mortality at 11 Years of Follow-up
- (2012) Fritz H. Schröder et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- General application of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance for active surveillance for men with prostate cancer is not appropriate in unscreened populations
- (2011) Lih-Ming Wong et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence
- (2011) Niall M. Corcoran et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Active Surveillance Program for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Johns Hopkins Experience
- (2011) Jeffrey J. Tosoian et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- A New Preoperative Nomogram to Predict Minimal Prostate Cancer: Accuracy and Error Rates Compared to Other Tools to Select Patients for Active Surveillance
- (2011) Beverley A. O'Brien et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Diffusion-weighted Endorectal MR Imaging at 3 T for Prostate Cancer: Tumor Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness
- (2011) Hebert Alberto Vargas et al. RADIOLOGY
- Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
- (2010) Matthew R. Cooperberg et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Role of Prostate Specific Antigen and Immediate Confirmatory Biopsy in Predicting Progression During Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
- (2010) Ari Adamy et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- A Critical Analysis of the Tumor Volume Threshold for Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Using a Data Set of a Randomized Screening Trial
- (2010) Tineke Wolters et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Evaluating Prediction Models (But Were Too Afraid to Ask)
- (2010) Andrew J. Vickers et al. UROLOGY
- Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer
- (2009) Laurence Klotz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men
- (2008) Felix K.-H. Chun et al. CANCER
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started