4.4 Article

Thermal Stability Studies Comparing IMX-101 (Dinitroanisole/Nitroguanidine/NTO) to Analogous Formulations Containing Dinitrotoluene

Journal

PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 98-113

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prep.201500150

Keywords

Insensitive munitions; 2; 4-Dinitroanisole (DNAN); 2; 4-Dinitrotoluene (DNT); IMX 101; TNT; RDX; Amatol 40; Thermal analysis; Isothermal kinetics; Mass spectrometry; Decomposition products

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) replacement, IMX-101, containing 43.5% 2,4-dinitroanisole (DNAN), 19.7% 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) and 36.8% nitro-guanidine (NQ), has been certified for use as an insensitive munition. IMX-101 has passed standardized performance, stability, and aging tests but in some categories was not necessarily an improvement over TNT or RDX. This study compared the thermal stability of DNAN and another low-melting nitroarene, 2,4-dinitrotoulene (DNT). When examined individually, DNAN was more stable; but formulated in IMX-101 with NTO and NQ, the opposite was true. In two part mixtures, NQ had a similar acceleratory effect on the decomposition of both nitroarenes, while NTO had a greater impact on DNAN than on NTO. Ammonia, a reported decomposition product of both NQ and NTO, also accelerated the decomposition of both DNAN and DNT, with a larger impact on DNAN. The formation of dinitroaniline, potentially due to the interaction between the nitroarenes and ammonia, was detected by LC/MS as a decomposition product when either nitroarene was combined with NTO and/or NQ, indicating that this molecule may play a significant role in the decomposition mechanism. While not advocating the use of DNT in insensitive munitions formulations, this study addresses the importance of chemical compatibility as a criterion for selecting replacement components in formulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available