4.5 Review

Duration of Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy Post-Percutaneous Intervention: Is There A Correct Amount of Time?

Journal

PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 285-298

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.09.001

Keywords

Drug eluting coronary stent; Antiplatelet therapy; In-stent thrombosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAFT) is effective in preventing in-stent thrombosis (IST) after placement of drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) and in attenuating risk of atherothrombotic events, primarily myocardial infarction, among patients with advanced coronary atherosclerosis. However, all studies of DAFT demonstrate an increased risk of moderate or severe bleeding for the duration of therapy. The extent of benefit and risk with various periods of DAPT after DES placement has been evaluated in multiple observational studies and randomized clinical trials. Most studies indicate little or no important reduction of ischemic events but significant increases in bleeding with prolonged treatment. The Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study was the only randomized trial sufficiently powered to assess IST as an individual endpoint, and this study found that continuing DAPT from 12 to 30 months after DES placement provided important reductions in IST and a composite of adverse ischemic events. When all data are considered, a cogent argument can be made for using just 3 to 6 months DAPT in patients treated with contemporary second generation DES when the goal of treatment is to avoid IST. Longer therapy should be recommended for patients treated with first generation DESs, for whom a persisting signal of IST risk is apparent, and for patients with low risk for bleeding who wish to minimize their risk of athero-thrombotic events, both related and unrelated to DES. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available