4.4 Article

Development and evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for the detection of fowl adenovirus serotypes 4 and 10 in attenuated vaccines

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 265, Issue -, Pages 59-65

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.09.005

Keywords

FAdV-4/10; Attenuated vaccine; ddPCR; Sensitivity; Specificity

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0501606]
  2. Funds of Shandong Double Tops Program [SYL2017YSTD11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, there has been an increase in reported cases of fowl adenovirus serotype 4 (FAdV-4) in chickens in China. The use of live attenuated vaccines contaminated with FAdV-4 has been proved to be one of the important causes of massive outbreaks of hydropericardium syndrome. To detect the contamination with FAdV-4 in attenuated vaccines more promptly and accurately, a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay was developed for the rapid detection of FAdV-4 and FAdV-10. The ability of this assay to detect FAdV-4 contamination in attenuated Newcastle disease virus vaccines was assessed in comparison to a quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and a conventional PCR assay. The findings indicated that the ddPCR assay could detect FAdV-4 contamination at 0.1 EID50/1,000 feathers, while the qPCR could detect FAdV-4 contamination at 1 EID50/1,000 feathers with identical genomic targets, which was 1,000-fold more sensitive than conventional PCR detection with a sensitivity of 10(2) EID50/1,000 feathers. The ddPCR assay also showed high specificity for FAdV-4/10 and no positive signals were detected for other FAdVs. Consequently, the intuitive and rapid results were especially suitable for the detection of FAdV-4 contamination in vaccines. In this study, a ddPCR assay was developed to effectively detect and quantify low-dose FAdV-4 contamination, providing a new method for rapid detection of FAdV-4 contamination in various samples, especially vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available