4.4 Article

Post-extraction stabilization of HIV viral RNA for quantitative molecular tests

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 182, Issue 1-2, Pages 104-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.03.006

Keywords

RNA virus; RNA stability; Molecular diagnosis; Viral load; Point-of-care

Funding

  1. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [GPH-A-00-01-00005-00]
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering for the Center [U54EB007949]
  3. Health Innovation Portfolio [48591]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two approaches to stabilize viral nucleic acid in processed clinical specimens were evaluated. HIV-1 RNA extracted from clinical specimens was stabilized in a dry matrix in a commercial product (RNAstable, Biomatrica, San Diego, CA, USA) and in a reverse-transcription reaction mixture in liquid form as cDNA. As few as 145 HIV-1 genome copies of viral RNA are reliably stabilized by RNAstable at 45 degrees C for 92 days and in the cDNA format at 45 degrees C for 7 days as determined by real-time PCR. With RNAstable the R-2 at days 1, 7, and 92 were 0.888, 0.871, and 0.943 when compared to baseline viral load values. The cDNA generated from the same clinical specimens was highly stable with an R-2 value of 0.762 when comparing viral load determinations at day 7 to baseline values. In conclusion viral RNA stabilized in a dry RNAstable matrix is highly stable for long periods of time at high temperatures across a substantial dynamic range. Viral RNA signal can also be stabilized in liquid in the form of cDNA for limited periods of time. Methods that reduce reliance on the cold chain and preserve specimen integrity are critical for extending the reach of molecular testing to low-resource settings. Products based on anhydrobiosis, such as the RNAstable should be evaluated further to support viral pathogen diagnosis. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available