4.4 Article

Markers of Systemic Inflammation in Horses with Heaves

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1419-1426

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00993.x

Keywords

Acute phase proteins; Airway neutrophilia; Recurrent airway obstruction; Serum cytokines

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [MOP-94848]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Systemic inflammation in horses with heaves is poorly characterized. Objectives To assess acute phase proteins (APP) and inflammatory cytokine profiles in serum of healthy horses and horses with heaves. Animals Six healthy horses and 6 heaves-affected horses belonging to the University of Montreal. Methods Prospective, observational study. Healthy and heaves-affected control horses were exposed to a 30-day natural challenge with hay and straw to induce clinical exacerbation of heaves. Serum samples were obtained by venipuncture before (T0) as well as after 7 (T7) and 30 days (T30) of stabling. Serum APP (haptoglobin, serum amyloid A protein [SAA] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) and cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IFN-a, IL-10, IFN-?, and CCL-2) were measured using singleplex or multiplex ELISA. Results Serum haptoglobin concentrations were significantly higher in heaves-affected horses at all time points with no overlap with those of healthy controls. They were also significantly increased by antigen challenge in both controls (T7) and horses with heaves (T7 and T30). Serum SAA was detected more frequently in heaves-affected horses compared with healthy controls at T7. There was no difference in serum concentrations of CRP, IL-10, IFN-?, and CCL-2 between groups, whereas IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-a remained undetectable in all samples. Conclusions and Clinical Importance In heaves, haptoglobin is a marker of both acute and chronic systemic inflammation, whereas high concentrations of SAA indicate acute inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available