4.2 Article

Comparison of two real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Equine arteritis virus nucleic acid in equine semen and tissue culture fluid

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 147-155

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/104063870802000202

Keywords

Equine arteritis virus; equine viral arteritis; nucleic acid detection; real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Funding

  1. American Quarter Horse Association
  2. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. College of Agriculture
  4. University Of Kentucky
  5. Geoffrey C. Hughes Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two previously developed TaqMan fluorogenic probe-based 1-tube real-time reverse transcription Polymerase Chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) assays (T1 and T2) were Compared and validated for the detection of Equine arteritis virus (EAV) nucleic acid in equine semen and tissue culture fluid (TCF). The specificity and sensitivity of these 2 molecular-based assays were Compared to traditional virus isolation (VI) ill Cell culture. The T1 real-time RT-PCR had a higher sensitivity (93.4%) than the T2 real-time RT-PCR (42.6%) for detection of EAV RNA ill semen. However, the T1 real-time RT-PCR was less sensitive (93.4%) than the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)-prescribed VI test (gold standard). The sensitivity of both PCR assays was high (100.0% [T1] and 95.2% [T2]) for detecting EAV RNA ill TCF. Ill light of the discrepancy in sensitivity between either real-time RT-PCR assay and VI, semen that is negative for EAV nucleic acid by real-time RT-PCR that is from ail AV-seropositive stallion should be confirmed free of virus by VI. Similarly. the presence of EAV in TCF samples that are VI-positive but real-time RT-PCR negative should be confirmed in a 1-way neutralization test using anti-EAV equine serum or by fluorescent antibody antibody test using monoclonal antibodies to EAV. If the viral isolate is not identified as EAV, such samples should be tested for other equine viral pathogens. The results of this study underscore the importance of comparative evaluation and Validation of real-time RT-PCR assays prior to their recommended Use ill a diagnostic setting for the detection and identification of specific infectious agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available