4.7 Article

Social genetic and social environment effects on parental and helper care in a cooperatively breeding bird

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0689

Keywords

indirect genetic effects; associative effects; cooperative breeding; kin selection; long-tailed tits; Aegithalos caudatus

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/1027118/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I027118/1, NBAF010001] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/I027118/1, NBAF010001] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenotypes expressed in a social context are not only a function of the individual, but can also be shaped by the phenotypes of social partners. These social effects may play a major role in the evolution of cooperative breeding if social partners differ in the quality of care they provide and if individual carers adjust their effort in relation to that of other carers. When applying social effects models to wild study systems, it is also important to explore sources of individual plasticity that could masquerade as social effects. We studied offspring provisioning rates of parents and helpers in a wild population of long-tailed tits Aegithalos caudatus using a quantitative genetic framework to identify these social effects and partition them into genetic, permanent environment and current environment components. Controlling for other effects, individuals were consistent in their provisioning effort at a given nest, but adjusted their effort based on who was in their social group, indicating the presence of social effects. However, these social effects differed between years and social contexts, indicating a current environment effect, rather than indicating a genetic or permanent environment effect. While this study reveals the importance of examining environmental and genetic sources of social effects, the framework we present is entirely general, enabling a greater understanding of potentially important social effects within any ecological population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available