4.4 Article

Nutrition sensitivity of the 2014 budget statement of Republic of Ghana

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 526-532

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0029665115002426

Keywords

Independent budget analysis; Scaling up nutrition; Nutrition-sensitive budgets; Scaling up Nutrition academic platform; Ghana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ghana's Constitution and several international treaties she has ratified demonstrate support for fundamental human rights to nutrition and freedom from hunger. However, it is unknown how this support is being translated into investment in nutrition. National budgets are important vehicles through which governments communicate intent to address pertinent national challenges. The present paper assesses the nutrition sensitivity of Ghana's budget statement for the year ending 31 December 2014. We perused the budget in its entirety, examining allocations to various sectors with the goal of identifying support for direct nutrition interventions. We examined allocations to various sectors as per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). The review shows that the total revenue and grants for the 2014 fiscal year is Ghana Cedis (GH cent) 26 001.9 million (25% of GDP). The total expenditure for the same period is estimated at GH cent 34 956.8 million (33.1 % of GDP). The health sector is allocated GH cent 3 353 707 814 (3.8 % of GDP). As of 28 October 2014, the Bank of Ghana's Official Exchange Rate was US$1 = GH cent 3.20. It is one of the key sectors whose interventions directly or indirectly impact on nutrition. However, the proportion of the national budget that goes to direct nutrition interventions is not evident in the budget. Nutrition is embedded in other budget lines. Allocations to relevant nutrition-sensitive sectors are very low (<0.5 % of GDP). We conclude that Ghana's 2014 budget statement pays scant attention to nutrition. By embedding nutrition in other budget lines, Ghana runs the risk of perpetually rolling out national spending actions insensitive to nutrition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available