4.0 Article

Vascular Effects of FGF-2 and VEGF-B in Rabbits with Bilateral Hind Limb Ischemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 45-54

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000139132

Keywords

Angiogenesis; Angiography; thigh vasculature; Collateral artery circulation; Growth factors; Ischemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To assess fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-B (VEGF-B) effects on flow reserve and morphological adaptation in the rabbit ischemic hind limb. Methods: Following bilateral femoral artery ligation, calf blood pressure ( C BP), flow reserve, collateral artery numbers and capillary numbers were assessed. Treatment consisted of rabbit serum albumin ( RSA), FGF-2, VEGF-B or FGF-2 + VEGF-B. Results: Ligation decreased C BP; on day 14, a 48% deficit remained in the RSA group compared with a deficit of only 22% in FGF-2 and VEGF-B groups. On day 3, flow reserve was attenuated 60%, but recovered by day 14 ( with no treatment effects). Collateral artery numbers increased with RSA (+28%), FGF-2 (+53%), VEGF-B (+47%) and FGF-2 + VEGF-B (+59%). Rectus femoris muscle total capillary profiles and fibers per cross-section were alike across groups. Tibialis anterior muscle cross-sectional area was lower with ligation and total capillary number was less in RSA and FGF-2 groups, providing evidence for angiogenesis with VEGF-B. Capillary/muscle fiber ratio was similar in each group. Conclusions: FGF-2 and VEGF-B enhanced lower limb perfusion as indicated by improved C BP and combined treatment increased collateral artery number. Flow reserve recovery was not enhanced by cytokine treatment. VEGF-B, but not FGF-2, caused angiogenesis in the tibialis anterior muscle. Overall, VEGF-B may have advantages over FGF-2 in this setting; however, their combination may further improve arteriogenesis. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available