4.5 Article

Formation and evolution of craters in carbon steels during low-energy high-current pulsed electron-beam treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 1217-1226

Publisher

A V S AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1116/1.3207948

Keywords

boiling; carbon steel; drops; electron beam effects; grain boundaries; melting; nucleation; phase diagrams; quenching (thermal); surface roughness; surface treatment; tempering

Funding

  1. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [J51402]
  2. Science Foundation for Excellent Youth Scholars [gjd08004]
  3. University Paul Verlaine Metz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors investigated in detail the formation and evolution of microcraters induced by low-energy high-current pulsed electron-beam treatment on several quenched and tempered carbon steels. They have shown that the crater formation mechanism is the same for the three selected steels regardless of the carbon content and original microstructure state. Melting starts at the subsurface layer during treatment, resulting in the nucleation of small droplets preferentially at grain or phase boundaries. Under further heating, the boiling droplets erupt through the surface. The liquid around these craters shrinks to supply the lost part and, during the cooling process, leads to the formation of the funnel-like crater morphology. Microirregularities help retain locally the heat flux and, consequently, serve as nucleation sites for crater formations. By increasing the number of pulses, microirregularities were gradually removed and melted layer depth increased. As a result, crater formation became less effective. On the other hand, some of the already formed craters were deepened, while others were eliminated during the following pulses. The above processes together cause the crater density to first increase and then decrease, whereas the surface roughness first increases and then remains at the same level with increasing number of pulses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available