4.8 Article

A CaMKII/PDE4D negative feedback regulates cAMP signaling

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419992112

Keywords

PDE; CaMKII; cAMP; beta-adrenergic signaling; cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL0927088]
  2. Fondation Leducq [06CVD02]
  3. American Heart Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

cAMP production and protein kinase A (PKA) are the most widely studied steps in beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) signaling in the heart; however, the multifunctional Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) is also activated in response to beta AR stimulation and is involved in the regulation of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Its activity and expression are increased during cardiac hypertrophy, in heart failure, and under conditions that promote arrhythmias both in animal models and in the human heart, underscoring the clinical relevance of CaMKII in cardiac pathophysiology. Both CaMKII and PKA phosphorylate a number of protein targets critical for Ca2+ handling and contraction with similar, but not always identical, functional consequences. How these two pathways communicate with each other remains incompletely understood, however. To maintain homeostasis, cyclic nucleotide levels are regulated by phosphodiesterases (PDEs), with PDE4s predominantly responsible for cAMP degradation in the rodent heart. Here we have reassessed the interaction between cAMP/PKA and Ca2+/CaMKII signaling. We demonstrate that CaMKII activity constrains basal and beta AR-activated cAMP levels. Moreover, we show that these effects are mediated, at least in part, by CaMKII regulation of PDE4D. This regulation establishes a negative feedback loop necessary to maintain cAMP/CaMKII homeostasis, revealing a previously unidentified function for PDE4D as a critical integrator of cAMP/PKA and Ca2+/CaMKII signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available