4.7 Article

Phase III randomized study of fotemustine and dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with or without interferon-α in advanced malignant melanoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-38

Keywords

Melanoma; Fotemustine; Dacarbazine; Interferon-alpha

Funding

  1. Fondazione Melanoma Onlus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The effect of the addition of fotemustine and/or interferon (IFN) to standard therapy with dacarbazine alone in patients with advanced malignant melanoma was investigated in a multicenter, randomized 2x2 factorial design trial. Methods: A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: (A) fotemustine and dacarbazine repeated on 3-week cycle; (B) same treatment as (A) plus IFN-alpha 2b three times per week; (C) dacarbazine alone repeated on 3-week cycle; (D) same treatment as (C) plus IFN-alpha 2b three times per week. Two comparisons were planned to assess the efficacy of fotemustine (groups A+B vs. C+D) and IFN-alpha 2b (groups A+C vs. B+D). Results: Addition of fotemustine did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) (p=0.28) or progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.55); Hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.93 (95% CI 0.71-1.21). Similarly, addition of IFN-alpha 2b did not improve OS (p=0.68) or PFS (p=0.65); HR for OS was 0.92 (95% CI 0.70-1.20). Overall response rate was not improved by the addition of either fotemustine (p=0.87) or IFN-alpha 2b (p=0.57). The combination of all three drugs resulted in the highest occurrence of adverse events. Conclusions: No significant improvement in outcomes were observed with the addition of either fotemustine or IFN-alpha 2b to dacarbazine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available